This site may earn chapter commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

Apple-4K-Feature

At its launch event yesterday, Apple announced a bold new strategy that could give information technology a leadership position in a critical marketplace. Marketing professionals and executives from other companies were left looking foolish past comparing and they'll undoubtedly scramble to keep up with the Cupertino-based company. I'm speaking, of form, most Apple tree's new 4K content strategy. Silly melodrama aside, the company'southward new pricing is a pretty big deal for long-term 4K adoption.

In that location were two components to Apple's announcement here. First, every 1080p moving picture you've previously purchased through iTunes will be bachelor in 4K + HDR at no additional cost (presumably these upgrades go in as new film versions are available). Second, 4K movies are going to bear the same price as 1080p films.

Up to this point, Apple has priced almost Hd films at $15 for 1080p, though there have been some $20 products as well. Other services, which already offer 4K purchases, have typically charged a $5 to $x boosted fee for the 4K selection. That'southward what the movie industry has favored, for obvious reasons — it makes significantly more money for delivering a different version of a moving picture, and it establishes 4K as a premium viewing experience that consumers are used to paying a premium for to enjoy.

Apple is pushing back on that model, and with good reason. The thought of paying $30 for a digital stream of a moving picture is cool. And while $20 isn't a peachy price, either, it'due south withal an comeback.

$179 to $199 for the new Apple Tv set 4K confronting a low-cost box elsewhere is a tough statement. "Plus, all your erstwhile 1080p iTunes movies are now 4K" is much more appealing.

The film industry would love nothing meliorate than to strength anybody to buy a new version of every film they own when they upgrade a tv. Back in the DVD era, this fabricated applied sense — the data on a VHS couldn't practically be upscaled to DVD quality, the video quality of DVDs doesn't degrade with repeated plays, and the advent of disc-based storage made it possible to transport extras and additional content that meaningfully improved whatever version of a flick you'd previously owned.

As time has passed, recreating previous film collections has gotten more than and more expensive, while offering fewer improvements (see: Blu-ray). The advent of streaming services simplifies this on the one hand, since you don't pay more for Netflix or Amazon Prime in 4K than y'all exercise in 1080p. Simply it also highlights how crazy it is to pay a $5-$10 higher rate to the motion-picture show studio for the privilege of streaming bits. A 4K HDR stream costs Sony simply as much equally a 1080p stream. Whatsoever difference in marginal price related to streaming the bits themselves is born by Amazon or the subscriber, not the studio.

Pushing content costs downwardly fits Apple'south concern model — it sells hardware and earns its coin in that location, not on software — merely it also benefits consumers. Apple's 4K TV box sales volition jump if information technology continues to offer price advantages other products tin can't match; if a hit movie is $20 on an Apple Tv set and $25 elsewhere, y'all don't demand to buy very many movies to see the hardware as paying for itself over time. The new Apple tree Television set is essentially more expensive than competitive offerings from other companies. Just Apple neatly took away that talking point with its push to cutting content costs, and reported plans to offering support for Amazon Prime and Netflix on the upcoming platform. All in all, a very smart move.